原题
suppose the only way you can save a number of innocent people is by killing another innocent person whose circumstances prevent the lives of another being saved (e.g. a child has been wired up with explosives – which the child is too young to understand – and told to run into a crowd where a treat awaits him. The explosives will detonate as soon as he reaches the crowd. There is no way of getting to the child or persuading him to turn around. Time is running out. So you shoot the child dead thereby detonating the explosives before the child reaches the crowd. The lives of the many in the crowd have been saved. The life of the innocent child loaded with explosives (which would have been lost in any case had he reached the crowd) has been deliberately taken.
假如你可以救很多无辜的人,但你要杀死另外的无辜者。例如一个孩子被绑上了炸药
-孩子太小什么也不明白,只是被告之跑向人群,那里有好吃的。只要孩子一到达人群,炸弹就会爆炸。没有其他办法接触上这个孩子,说服他回去。时间在流逝,你只好在他到达人群之前射死这个孩子以引爆炸药。由于炸药及时引爆,人群被救了,孩子死了。
欢迎光临 BrisbaneBBS.com悠悠网 | 布里斯班中文网_昆士兰华人论坛_黄金海岸论坛_Goldcoast_租房_工作_交友_同城 (http://sinomedia.com.au/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |